At the moment, you can just dismiss the notice and go about your business. But this summer official Messenger app.
I’m a little worried about this, because surely the mobile site is much used by people who have instance, or who can’t upgrade to the latest version of an OS, and must access via the web.
And really, it strikes me as quite a hostile move, as it did before when they axed messaging want to connect the world, shouldn’t a diversity of access options be part of that?
I don’t think a single person has ever bought that particular load of horsefeathers. It’s pretty platform like Messenger, while it’s near-impossible to do so with basic text-based chat.
In other words, one service provides valuable utility to users, but not to Facebook. Can’t have that!
— that’s okay! It’s perfectly fine that posts look different, you interact with things differently and certain features are absent or less easily accessed. This should be the case with messaging. .
By all means, advertise Messenger on top of the message feed, or point out that some content will be missing. Messenger is more full-featured! You can do video, and stickers! Look, erodes a trust it should be tending to carefully.
works, by the way)! This geo-restriction BS has got to go. Some of us have the phone
No comments:
Post a Comment